There is no mention yet about the role of high officials who direct instructions and regulation in investigation by the investigation team, who recommended the action against the accused from the youth to the Superintendent of Police (SP) by the police team (SP), formed by police headquarters to study the role of police in Nirmala Pant murder case.



As per the action taken by the officials of the lower rank, the Leader of the Committee, the Additional Inspector General (AIG), is being named as 'Ovano over water'.

Coordinator of Research Committee on Police's role, Basayat (at that time, DIG) was under the leadership of the Crime Investigation Department at the initial investigation of the Nirmala murder case itself. He would be regular brifing about the progress being carried out in the incident by the District Police Office, Kanchanpur.

Similarly, the then Chief DIG Narendra Singh Khadka of Central Research Bureau (CIB), along with the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Police Superintendent of Police (SSP) Vikram Chand, District 7, was also investigating the incident as "Supervision" from the beginning.

The responsibility to monitor and regulate the activities being carried out by the sewage body in research is from SSP Chand, head of the then Crime Investigation Department, till the SSP Chand, Police Inspector Surveendra Khanal. However, in the report of the Investigation Committee, there is no discussion about the role, responsibility and responsibility of the 'officials'. Instead, it has been concealed and accountable for floor level officials.

If any incident is successful, research is the same as the 'authorities'. However, when weakened, floor level officials are stuck only. This explains the source of dissatisfaction within the police organization.

In a crime-related crime investigation, a police officer of Pokhto Nepal Police questioned the informal conversation with online business, "Why should all super office officers have to keep the supervisors in the district head and research officer's head?" Why is the State Police Office? Not only when District and Headquarter?

He has made such a mistake when the team formed to investigate the negligence of the police on Nimla murder case, showing only faults to lower officials.

It is possible to create a counterfeit accused in the involvement of the Superintendent (SP) and floor level officials in the police organization running on 'Chain of Command'? Why are the investigators who are trying to raise fake accusations for sending a "false swing" test? Why can the accused be released again on that basis? The police organization has started raising such questions.
x